<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (Final?) Thesis Paper Abstract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamin.org/archives/2008/final-thesis-paper-abstract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamin.org/archives/2008/final-thesis-paper-abstract/</link>
	<description>Jamin Hegeman on design, writing, and life</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Thinking Behind Design &#124; jamin.org</title>
		<link>http://jamin.org/archives/2008/final-thesis-paper-abstract/#comment-70094</link>
		<dc:creator>The Thinking Behind Design &#124; jamin.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 05:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamin.org/archives/2008/final-thesis-paper-abstract/#comment-70094</guid>
		<description>[...] not a huge change from the previous abstract, but it&#8217;s definitely very different from the first, which had to do with making the leap from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not a huge change from the previous abstract, but it&#8217;s definitely very different from the first, which had to do with making the leap from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herbert</title>
		<link>http://jamin.org/archives/2008/final-thesis-paper-abstract/#comment-55614</link>
		<dc:creator>Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamin.org/archives/2008/final-thesis-paper-abstract/#comment-55614</guid>
		<description>Hey Jamin, I know is kind of late for these kinds of comments but... anyway.
I think is really interesting your THEME. Last week, I had an argument  with a couple of faculty members in charge of financing academic research. According to their point of view, "design doing" isn't research as they define it (The forms we have to fill have two checkboxes at the beginning: 'science' or 'technology'... nothing remotely close to 'design').
Reading Paul Feyerabend, came handy for this discussion.
I know you don't have room for more bibliography, but anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jamin, I know is kind of late for these kinds of comments but&#8230; anyway.<br />
I think is really interesting your THEME. Last week, I had an argument  with a couple of faculty members in charge of financing academic research. According to their point of view, &#8220;design doing&#8221; isn&#8217;t research as they define it (The forms we have to fill have two checkboxes at the beginning: &#8217;science&#8217; or &#8216;technology&#8217;&#8230; nothing remotely close to &#8216;design&#8217;).<br />
Reading Paul Feyerabend, came handy for this discussion.<br />
I know you don&#8217;t have room for more bibliography, but anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
