Comments on: Pluralism and Objectivity http://jamin.org/archives/2006/pluralism-and-objectivity/ Jamin Hegeman on design, writing, and life Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:58:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Jamin http://jamin.org/archives/2006/pluralism-and-objectivity/comment-page-1/#comment-3626 Jamin Sat, 16 Dec 2006 05:51:23 +0000 http://jamin.org/archives/2006/pluralism-and-objectivity/#comment-3626 True. I've tried to figure out what I was thinking when I wrote that, but I can't think of anything to counter with. So I can only imagine I was under some Buchananian spell. True. I’ve tried to figure out what I was thinking when I wrote that, but I can’t think of anything to counter with. So I can only imagine I was under some Buchananian spell.

]]> By: jc http://jamin.org/archives/2006/pluralism-and-objectivity/comment-page-1/#comment-3082 jc Fri, 08 Dec 2006 12:37:59 +0000 http://jamin.org/archives/2006/pluralism-and-objectivity/#comment-3082 "I’m at a school studying design, which inclines one to think there is subject matter to study." Design itself is not married to a given subject - this does not mean that Design is not a subject itself. “I’m at a school studying design, which inclines one to think there is subject matter to study.”

Design itself is not married to a given subject – this does not mean that Design is not a subject itself.

]]>